Forecasting the Nasdaq-100's volatility with HAR-RV
Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 (MNQ) · 5-minute bars · 2016 to 2026 · Volatility · The model of Corsi (2009)
Marginal: profit factor 1.10 out of sample, not clearly above break-even, t = 0.7.
- Profit factor, out of sample
- 1.10
- Average trade, out of sample
- +0.04R
- Win rate, out of sample
- 45%
- Trades, 10 years
- 1,210
- Max drawdown
- $7,911
- Pass odds, median plan
- 4.8%
Hypothetical results. These results are based on simulated or hypothetical performance results that have certain inherent limitations. Unlike the results shown in an actual performance record, these results do not represent actual trading. Also, because these trades have not actually been executed, these results may have under- or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated or hypothetical trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to these being shown.
Abstract
We backtested the HAR-RV volatility forecast rules on Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 (MNQ) 5-minute bars from 2016-01-11 to 2026-10-30: 1,210 trades, with commission and a tick of slippage on every market and stop fill. In sample (to 2023-08-03) it made +0.04R per trade with a profit factor of 1.04; out of sample (from 2023-08-04) +0.04R per trade and 1.10 over 386 trades. 13 of the 16 parameter settings we tried were profitable out of sample. Sized at $250 of risk a trade, simulated 50K evaluations passed 1% to 9% of the time across 36 tracked plans.
1Hypothesis
Realized volatility clusters: today's predicts tomorrow's. We fit Corsi's HAR model on the past only, then trade the opening range breakout only on days it expects to be volatile.
If breakouts need volatility and HAR forecasts it, trading the opening range breakout only on high-forecast days should do better than trading it every day.
2Data
- Instrument
- Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 (MNQ), traded on the NQ price series (NQ.c.0: front month, rolled on the calendar). CME Globex via Databento.
- Period
- 2016-01-11 to 2026-10-30: 2,745 sessions, 1,056,797 one-minute bars, built into 210,814 5-minute bars of the regular session (09:30 to 16:00 ET).
- Costs
- $0.75 commission a contract each way and 1 tick ($0.50) of slippage on every market and stop fill. Limit orders fill when price touches them; market orders fill at the next bar's open and stops at their price, each with one tick of slippage; when a bar touches both the stop and the target, the stop counts.
- Position size
- About $250 of risk a trade: micro contracts, rounded down, at least one. R is a trade's net P&L divided by its risk at entry.
- Out of sample
- The last 30% of weekdays: 2023-08-04 on (846 days), after 1,974 in-sample days. The rules were fixed before either side was run.
3Method
Our reading of the publicly described rules; the creator may trade it differently. The rules, exactly as the code runs them:
- Realized volatility (RV) of a session is the square root of the sum of its squared 5-minute log returns, regular session only (the overnight gap left out).
- After each session, the model log RV(t+1) = b0 + b1 log RV(t) + b2 mean(log RV, last 5 days) + b3 mean(log RV, last 22 days) is refitted by least squares on every past day, and forecasts the next.
- Trade the next day only if its forecast is at least the min_quantile (0.5, the median) of the last 250 forecasts, and at most their max_quantile (1), and after 250 days of forecasts.
- The trade is the 15-minute opening range breakout: the first 5-minute close outside the 09:30-09:45 ET range, until 12:00 ET, stop at the other side, target target_r (2) times the risk, flat at 15:55 ET.
- Size: about risk_usd dollars of risk a trade (micro contracts, rounded down, at least 1 and at most max_contracts).
"""A HAR-RV volatility forecast as a filter for the 15-minute opening range breakout, on Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 (MNQ). The forecast is Corsi's (2009) HAR model of realized volatility, in logs, fitted day by day on the pastonly (an expanding window), so every forecast is out of sample when it is made. Rules: 1. Realized volatility (RV) of a session is the square root of the sum of its squared 5-minute log returns, regular session only (the overnight gap left out). 2. After each session, the model log RV(t+1) = b0 + b1 log RV(t) + b2 mean(log RV, last 5 days) + b3 mean(log RV, last 22 days) is refitted by least squares on every past day, and forecasts the next. 3. Trade the next day only if its forecast is at least the `min_quantile` (0.5, the median) of the last 250 forecasts, and at most their `max_quantile` (1), and after 250 days of forecasts. 4. The trade is the 15-minute opening range breakout: the first 5-minute close outside the 09:30-09:45 ET range, until 12:00 ET, stop at the other side, target `target_r` (2) times the risk, flat at 15:55 ET. 5. Size: about `risk_usd` dollars of risk a trade (micro contracts, rounded down, at least 1 and at most `max_contracts`)."""import math import qy def ready(*values): """True when every value is a number (indicators have no value until they have enough data).""" return all(v is not None and v == v for v in values) def solve(a, b): """Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting for a small system a x = b.""" n = len(b) m = [row[:] + [b[i]] for i, row in enumerate(a)] for c in range(n): p = max(range(c, n), key=lambda r: abs(m[r][c])) if abs(m[p][c]) < 1e-12: return None m[c], m[p] = m[p], m[c] for r in range(n): if r != c: f = m[r][c] / m[c][c] m[r] = [x - f * y for x, y in zip(m[r], m[c])] return [m[i][n] / m[i][i] for i in range(n)] class Bot(qy.Strategy): """Trade the opening range breakout only on days the HAR model expects to be volatile.""" symbol = "MNQ" timeframe = "5m" session = "rth" params = {"min_quantile": 0.5, "max_quantile": 1.0, "target_r": 2.0, "risk_usd": 250, "max_contracts": 50} max_position = 50 entry_window = ("09:45", "12:00") flatten_time = "15:55" overnight = False def setup(self): self.or_high, self.or_low = self.opening_range(minutes=15) self.day = None self.last = None self.ss = 0.0 self.logrv = [] self.xtx = [[0.0] * 4 for _ in range(4)] self.xty = [0.0] * 4 self.n = 0 self.forecasts = [] self.trade_today = False self.done_day = None def _size(self, risk_points): per_contract = risk_points * self.point_value n = int(self.p.risk_usd // per_contract) if per_contract > 0 else 1 return max(1, min(self.p.max_contracts, n)) def _features(self, k): lr = self.logrv return [1.0, lr[k], sum(lr[k - 4:k + 1]) / 5, sum(lr[k - 21:k + 1]) / 22] def _end_of_day(self): if self.ss <= 0: return self.logrv.append(math.log(math.sqrt(self.ss) * 100)) k = len(self.logrv) - 1 if k >= 22: # yesterday's features, today's value: one more pair for the fit x = self._features(k - 1) for i in range(4): self.xty[i] += x[i] * self.logrv[k] for j in range(4): self.xtx[i][j] += x[i] * x[j] self.n += 1 if k >= 21 and self.n >= 60: beta = solve(self.xtx, self.xty) if beta: self.forecasts.append(sum(b * v for b, v in zip(beta, self._features(k)))) self.forecasts = self.forecasts[-251:] def _decide(self): past = self.forecasts[:-1] if len(past) < 250: return False f = self.forecasts[-1] rank = sum(1 for v in past if v <= f) / len(past) return self.p.min_quantile <= rank <= self.p.max_quantile def on_bar(self, bar): if bar.date != self.day: if self.day is not None: self._end_of_day() self.day, self.ss, self.last = bar.date, 0.0, bar.close self.trade_today = self._decide() else: r = math.log(bar.close / self.last) self.ss += r * r self.last = bar.close high, low = self.or_high[0], self.or_low[0] if not self.trade_today or not ready(high, low) or self.done_day == bar.date or not self.position.is_flat: return close = bar.close if low <= close <= high: return self.done_day = bar.date if bar.dt.hour * 60 + bar.dt.minute + 5 > 720: return f = (high - low) / close * 100 if close > high: self.buy(self._size(close - low), stop_price=low, target_r=self.p.target_r, tag=f"HAR ORB long | f={f:.4f}") else: self.sell(self._size(high - close), stop_price=high, target_r=self.p.target_r, tag=f"HAR ORB short | f={f:.4f}")4Results
| Statistic | In sample | Out of sample | All |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trades | 824 | 386 | 1,210 |
| Net P&L | +$3,909 | +$4,868 | +$8,777 |
| Profit factor | 1.04 | 1.10 | 1.06 |
| Average trade | +0.04R | +0.04R | +0.04R |
| 95% interval of the average | −0.04 to 0.12 | −0.07 to 0.15 | −0.03 to 0.10 |
| t-statistic of trade R | 0.91 | 0.71 | 1.15 |
| Win rate | 43% | 45% | 44% |
| Average win / average loss | 1.38 | 1.32 | 1.36 |
| Max drawdown | $7,821 | $7,911 | $7,911 |
| Sharpe ratio (daily, annualized) | 0.28 | 0.61 | 0.40 |
| Longest losing streak | 13 | 6 | 13 |
| Long / short profit factor | 1.12 / 0.97 | 1.09 / 1.10 | 1.11 / 1.02 |
| Average holding time | 214 min | 222 min | 217 min |
| Commission paid | $2,850 | $633 | $3,483 |
Drag across the chart to zoom into a period, double-click to reset.
Averages: +0.04R in sample, +0.04R out of sample.
1,600 of 2,727 points drawn; the fit and the means use all of them. Drag a box to zoom, double-click to reset.
Drag a box to zoom, double-click to reset.
Below: the HAR forecast against what was realized, out-of-sample days only, log x-axis, log y-axis; the dashed line is the OLS fit (r = 0.55, p < 0.001, n = 821; Spearman ρ = 0.57). Out of sample alone: r = 0.55, p < 0.001. The dotted line is y = x.
Drag a box to zoom, double-click to reset.
| Version | Trades | PF in sample | PF out of sample | Avg R out | Sharpe out | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-forecast days (as tested) | 1,210 | 1.04 | 1.10 | +0.04R | 0.61 | $7,911 |
| Every day, no forecast filter | 2,363 | 1.05 | 1.07 | +0.04R | 0.43 | $10,071 |
| Low-forecast days only | 1,161 | 1.06 | 1.03 | +0.05R | 0.19 | $5,227 |
5Robustness
We reran the strategy on a grid of 16 settings of its two main parameters, each on the full history with the same split. 9 were profitable in sample and 13 out of sample.
Forecast at least (quantile) across, target (R) up. Solid outline: the defaults we tested; dashed: the in-sample best.
Hover a cell for both sides of the split.
Forecast at least (quantile) 0.00 to 0.67 across · Target (R) 1.00 to 3.00 in depth · Profit factor, out of sample 0.95 to 1.15 as height and shade. Drag or use the arrow keys to turn it.
Drag to rotate; ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
What would change it
Nothing on the grid helps. Its in-sample best, forecast at least (quantile) 0 and target (R) 3, had profit factor 1.06 in sample but 1.06 out of sample, against 1.10 for the defaults.
6Prop-firm implications
The backtest's sessions run through the rules of 36 tracked 50K evaluations: 2,000 runs of up to 60 sessions each, with the drawdown and daily limits checked against each trade's intraday low. Intervals are Wilson 95% intervals of the simulation. A simulation of the past, not the chance that anyone passes.
| Plan | Pass odds, 95% interval | Pass | Fail | Out of time | Median sessions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FundedNext Futures Flex Challenge 50K | 9.1% | 43% | 48% | 46 | |
| Alpha Futures Zero 50K Evaluation | 5.0% | 22% | 73% | 49 | |
| Apex Trader Funding 50K EOD Evaluation | 5.0% | 22% | 73% | 49 | |
| Apex Trader Funding 50K Intraday Trailing Drawdown Evaluation | 5.0% | 28% | 67% | 49 | |
| AquaFutures Beginner 50K Evaluation | 5.0% | 10% | 85% | 49 | |
| Bulenox 50K Qualification Account (Legacy, Option 1, trailing drawdown) | 5.0% | 13% | 82% | 49 | |
| Bulenox 50K Qualification Account (Legacy, Option 2, EOD drawdown) | 5.0% | 10% | 85% | 49 | |
| Elite Trader Funding 50K 1-Step Evaluation | 5.0% | 29% | 66% | 49 | |
| Elite Trader Funding 50K End of Day Drawdown Evaluation | 5.0% | 23% | 73% | 49 | |
| Funded Futures Family 50K Evaluation (standard plan) | 5.0% | 22% | 73% | 49 |
7Limitations
- The forecast uses regular-session 5-minute returns only.
- The filter is tested on one breakout rule and one market (MNQ).
- A backtest on the past, with fills simulated from one-minute bars; live fills, queues and outages differ.
8Conclusion
Marginal: profit factor 1.10 out of sample, not clearly above break-even, t = 0.7. Nothing on the grid helps. Its in-sample best, forecast at least (quantile) 0 and target (R) 3, had profit factor 1.06 in sample but 1.06 out of sample, against 1.10 for the defaults. The result is too close to break-even to tell apart from noise after costs.
9References
- Corsi, F. (2009). A Simple Approximate Long-Memory Model of Realized Volatility. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 7(2), 174-196.
- Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., and Labys, P. (2003). Modeling and Forecasting Realized Volatility. Econometrica, 71(2), 579-625.