Volatility-targeted sizing for an opening range breakout
Micro E-mini S&P 500 (MES) · 5-minute bars · 2016 to 2026 · Volatility
Marginal: profit factor 1.08 out of sample, not clearly above break-even, t = 0.7.
- Profit factor, out of sample
- 1.08
- Average trade, out of sample
- +0.03R
- Win rate, out of sample
- 43%
- Trades, 10 years
- 2,687
- Max drawdown
- $41,467
- Pass odds, median plan
- 19.4%
Hypothetical results. These results are based on simulated or hypothetical performance results that have certain inherent limitations. Unlike the results shown in an actual performance record, these results do not represent actual trading. Also, because these trades have not actually been executed, these results may have under- or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated or hypothetical trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to these being shown.
Abstract
We backtested the volatility-targeted sizing rules on Micro E-mini S&P 500 (MES) 5-minute bars from 2016-01-11 to 2026-10-30: 2,687 trades, with commission and a tick of slippage on every market and stop fill. In sample (to 2023-08-03) it made −0.04R per trade with a profit factor of 0.94; out of sample (from 2023-08-04) +0.03R per trade and 1.08 over 812 trades. 16 of the 16 parameter settings we tried were profitable out of sample. Sized at $250 of risk a trade, simulated 50K evaluations passed 11% to 22% of the time across 36 tracked plans.
1Hypothesis
Keep the trades, change the size: risk more when recent volatility is low and less when it is high, and compare with a flat risk and a flat contract count.
If volatility forecasts risk better than it forecasts returns, sizing against recent volatility should smooth the equity curve without changing the edge per unit of risk.
2Data
- Instrument
- Micro E-mini S&P 500 (MES), traded on the ES price series (ES.c.0: front month, rolled on the calendar). CME Globex via Databento.
- Period
- 2016-01-11 to 2026-10-30: 2,746 sessions, 1,056,820 one-minute bars, built into 210,816 5-minute bars of the regular session (09:30 to 16:00 ET).
- Costs
- $0.75 commission a contract each way and 1 tick ($1.25) of slippage on every market and stop fill. Limit orders fill when price touches them; market orders fill at the next bar's open and stops at their price, each with one tick of slippage; when a bar touches both the stop and the target, the stop counts.
- Position size
- About $250 of risk a trade: micro contracts, rounded down, at least one. R is a trade's net P&L divided by its risk at entry.
- Out of sample
- The last 30% of weekdays: 2023-08-04 on (846 days), after 1,974 in-sample days. The rules were fixed before either side was run.
3Method
Our reading of the publicly described rules; the creator may trade it differently. The rules, exactly as the code runs them:
- The trade is the 15-minute opening range breakout: the first 5-minute close outside the 09:30-09:45 ET range, until 12:00 ET, stop at the other side, target 2 times the risk, flat at 15:55 ET.
- Volatility is the standard deviation of the last vol_len (20) daily returns (regular-session closes); its long-run level is the average of that over the last 250 days.
- Size (sizing "vol"): risk risk_usd (250) dollars times long-run volatility over current volatility, between 0.25 and cap (2) times, in micro contracts, rounded down, at least 1. "risk" risks a flat 250 dollars a trade; "fixed" trades contracts (2) micros every time.
"""Volatility-targeted sizing for a 15-minute opening range breakout, on Micro E-mini S&P 500 (MES). The entries and exits stay the same; only the size changes. The paper compares three ways to size it. Rules: 1. The trade is the 15-minute opening range breakout: the first 5-minute close outside the 09:30-09:45 ET range, until 12:00 ET, stop at the other side, target 2 times the risk, flat at 15:55 ET. 2. Volatility is the standard deviation of the last `vol_len` (20) daily returns (regular-session closes); its long-run level is the average of that over the last 250 days. 3. Size (`sizing` "vol"): risk `risk_usd` (250) dollars times long-run volatility over current volatility, between 0.25 and `cap` (2) times, in micro contracts, rounded down, at least 1. "risk" risks a flat 250 dollars a trade; "fixed" trades `contracts` (2) micros every time."""import math import qy def ready(*values): """True when every value is a number (indicators have no value until they have enough data).""" return all(v is not None and v == v for v in values) class Bot(qy.Strategy): """The opening range breakout, sized to volatility.""" symbol = "MES" timeframe = "5m" session = "rth" params = {"sizing": "vol", "vol_len": 20, "cap": 2.0, "contracts": 2, "risk_usd": 250, "max_contracts": 50} max_position = 50 entry_window = ("09:45", "12:00") flatten_time = "15:55" overnight = False def setup(self): self.or_high, self.or_low = self.opening_range(minutes=15) self.day = None self.last = None self.closes, self.vols = [], [] self.done_day = None def _scale(self): n = self.p.vol_len if len(self.closes) <= n or not self.vols: return 1.0 rets = [math.log(b / a) for a, b in zip(self.closes[-n - 1:-1], self.closes[-n:])] m = sum(rets) / n vol = math.sqrt(sum((r - m) ** 2 for r in rets) / (n - 1)) long_run = sum(self.vols) / len(self.vols) return max(0.25, min(self.p.cap, long_run / vol)) if vol > 0 else 1.0 def _size(self, risk_points): if self.p.sizing == "fixed": return self.p.contracts budget = self.p.risk_usd * (self._scale() if self.p.sizing == "vol" else 1.0) per_contract = risk_points * self.point_value n = int(budget // per_contract) if per_contract > 0 else 1 return max(1, min(self.p.max_contracts, n)) def _end_of_day(self): self.closes = (self.closes + [self.last])[-300:] n = self.p.vol_len if len(self.closes) > n: rets = [math.log(b / a) for a, b in zip(self.closes[-n - 1:-1], self.closes[-n:])] m = sum(rets) / n self.vols = (self.vols + [math.sqrt(sum((r - m) ** 2 for r in rets) / (n - 1))])[-250:] def on_bar(self, bar): if bar.date != self.day: if self.day is not None: self._end_of_day() self.day = bar.date self.last = bar.close high, low = self.or_high[0], self.or_low[0] if not ready(high, low) or self.done_day == bar.date or not self.position.is_flat: return close = bar.close if low <= close <= high: return self.done_day = bar.date if bar.dt.hour * 60 + bar.dt.minute + 5 > 720: return f = self._scale() if close > high: self.buy(self._size(close - low), stop_price=low, target_r=2.0, tag=f"ORB long | f={f:.4f}") else: self.sell(self._size(high - close), stop_price=high, target_r=2.0, tag=f"ORB short | f={f:.4f}")4Results
| Statistic | In sample | Out of sample | All |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trades | 1,875 | 812 | 2,687 |
| Net P&L | −$19,552 | +$8,487 | −$11,065 |
| Profit factor | 0.94 | 1.08 | 0.97 |
| Average trade | −0.04R | +0.03R | −0.02R |
| 95% interval of the average | −0.09 to 0.02 | −0.06 to 0.11 | −0.06 to 0.03 |
| t-statistic of trade R | −1.33 | 0.66 | −0.74 |
| Win rate | 41% | 43% | 42% |
| Average win / average loss | 1.33 | 1.44 | 1.36 |
| Max drawdown | $41,467 | $9,487 | $41,467 |
| Sharpe ratio (daily, annualized) | −0.43 | 0.49 | −0.17 |
| Longest losing streak | 16 | 9 | 16 |
| Long / short profit factor | 1.05 / 0.82 | 1.06 / 1.09 | 1.05 / 0.89 |
| Average holding time | 207 min | 195 min | 203 min |
| Commission paid | $21,770 | $4,304 | $26,073 |
Drag across the chart to zoom into a period, double-click to reset.
Averages: −0.04R in sample, +0.03R out of sample.
1,600 of 2,687 points drawn; the fit and the means use all of them. Drag a box to zoom, double-click to reset.
| Version | Trades | PF in sample | PF out of sample | Avg R out | Sharpe out | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility-targeted (as tested) | 2,687 | 0.94 | 1.08 | +0.03R | 0.49 | $41,467 |
| $250 of risk every trade | 2,687 | 0.92 | 1.06 | +0.03R | 0.41 | $32,451 |
| 2 micros every trade | 2,687 | 0.96 | 1.05 | +0.03R | 0.32 | $14,194 |
5Robustness
We reran the strategy on a grid of 16 settings of its two main parameters, each on the full history with the same split. 0 were profitable in sample and 16 out of sample.
Volatility window (days) across, largest size multiple up. Solid outline: the defaults we tested; dashed: the in-sample best.
Hover a cell for both sides of the split.
Volatility window (days) 10.0 to 60.0 across · Largest size multiple 1.50 to 4.00 in depth · Profit factor, out of sample 1.07 to 1.10 as height and shade. Drag or use the arrow keys to turn it.
Drag to rotate; ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
What would change it
Nothing on the grid helps. Its in-sample best, volatility window (days) 40 and largest size multiple 3, had profit factor 0.94 in sample but 1.10 out of sample, against 1.08 for the defaults.
6Prop-firm implications
The backtest's sessions run through the rules of 36 tracked 50K evaluations: 2,000 runs of up to 60 sessions each, with the drawdown and daily limits checked against each trade's intraday low. Intervals are Wilson 95% intervals of the simulation. A simulation of the past, not the chance that anyone passes.
| Plan | Pass odds, 95% interval | Pass | Fail | Out of time | Median sessions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AquaFutures Beginner 50K Evaluation | 21.5% | 62% | 16% | 29 | |
| Bulenox 50K Qualification Account (Legacy, Option 2, EOD drawdown) | 21.5% | 63% | 16% | 29 | |
| FundedNext Futures Flex Challenge 50K | 21.0% | 78% | 1% | 21 | |
| Bulenox 50K Qualification Account (Legacy, Option 1, trailing drawdown) | 20.9% | 68% | 11% | 29 | |
| Alpha Futures Standard 50K Evaluation | 19.4% | 73% | 7% | 27 | |
| Alpha Futures Zero 50K Evaluation | 19.4% | 73% | 7% | 27 | |
| Apex Trader Funding 50K EOD Evaluation | 19.4% | 73% | 7% | 27 | |
| FTMO Futures Growth 50K Evaluation | 19.4% | 73% | 7% | 27 | |
| Funded Futures Family 50K Evaluation (standard plan) | 19.4% | 73% | 7% | 27 | |
| Funded Futures Network Standard MAX 50K Evaluation | 19.4% | 73% | 7% | 27 |
7Limitations
- Sizing can't create an edge: if the trades lose, every version loses.
- One rule and one market (MES).
- A backtest on the past, with fills simulated from one-minute bars; live fills, queues and outages differ.
8Conclusion
Marginal: profit factor 1.08 out of sample, not clearly above break-even, t = 0.7. Nothing on the grid helps. Its in-sample best, volatility window (days) 40 and largest size multiple 3, had profit factor 0.94 in sample but 1.10 out of sample, against 1.08 for the defaults. The result is too close to break-even to tell apart from noise after costs.
9References
- Moreira, A., and Muir, T. (2017). Volatility-Managed Portfolios. Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1611-1644.